Showing posts with label #RefugeesWelcome. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #RefugeesWelcome. Show all posts

Monday, 6 June 2016

Britain: Where non-Muslim honesty is worse than Muslim rape

I haven't seen too much of the response to Nigel Farage's recent remarks to the effect that remaining in the EU could lead to mass sex attacks by immigrant men like those seen Cologne and elsewhere in Germany in recent months. But no matter, since I've read of Shami Chakbrabarti's response, and I'm confident that it's a good representation of the party line among all the other footsoldiers of spineless virtue-signalling in politics, the media, and commentariat with regard to Farage's honesty.

To re-cap, here's what Farage actually said:

"The nuclear bomb this time would be about Cologne", referring, of course, to the wave of organised sexual assaults, rapes, and robberies carried out by mostly North African immigrants targeting hundreds of German women in Cologne on New Year's Eve last year. Attacks, which, it's worth remembering, were at first buried by law enforcement, mainstream media, and politicians, and would have remained so but for social media, and right-wing media platforms like Breitbart.

Farage added: "There are some very big cultural issues", and when asked if similar mass sex attacks could occur in the UK, he replied, "It depends if they get EU passports. It depends if we vote for Brexit or not. It is an issue."

According to Chakrabarti, Farage's comments "can only be designed to stir up disharmony, disunity, possibly even racial hatred".

Weird. Called me old fashioned but I reckon acts of mass rape, sexual assault, and torture of European women by foreigners - almost always Muslims, by the way - are liable to "stir up disharmony, disunity and racial hatred" more so than some politician daring to make reference to them having actually happened after the fact.

In fact, I reckon said acts of mass rape, sexual assault, and torture against European women by almost entirely Muslim foreigners are in fact evidence of racial and religious hatred on the part of the Muslim influx.

Oh, and top of that, I reckon we ought to be very cautious as to how much "unity" or "harmony" we can ever expect to achieve with the ongoing influx of large numbers of people raised in a religion which tells its followers that all non-believers are filthy, immoral, deceitful, and essentially a living, breathing "fuck you" to (their) God, that to adopt their ways or to be friends with them is forbidden, and that, as Muslims, their most important duty and highest possible cause in life is to conquer and subjugate the non-believers and impose the all-encompassing legal, social, and political blueprint of their totalitarian religion over all peoples everywhere, by demographic, political, and military means. That's one of the many lessons we should have learned by now, several decades into Western Europe's great left-wing experiment with Muslim mass immigration.

But there you go. I'm just a right-wing Islamophobe, so I would say all that.

Chakrabarti, speaking on LBC radio, continued:

"It's a classic racist trope, used by racists all over the world, to suggest that women are at risk from marauding hoards of people from another religion or race."

Erm, well. Here's the thing Shami: It's already been proven true, and continues to be proven true all over Britain, and all over Western Europe. Wherever one looks across Western Europe, one will see that Muslim men, almost regardless of their ethnic or racial origin, are far more likely to commit sex crimes than the indigenous peoples.

It also, of course, directly explains the spate of acts of mass sexual assault seen in Cologne and other German cities on New Year's Eve, the recent sexual assaults at a music festival in Darmstadt, in connection with which Pakistani asylum seekers were arrested, and the endless reports of acts of rape in public leisure facilities and such like across the country, and in others affected by the migrant influxOf course, it also explains the epidemic of grooming, sexual abuse, and torture of non-Muslim girls (mainly white for the obvious that they're the majority, but also Sikh and Hindu girls quite often) by predominantly Pakistani and Kashmiri Muslim men in towns and cities all across the UK. Note here that in many cases, the perpetrators will be the sons or grandsons of the people who actually came here from those places, living as they usually do in their own self-established Muslim enclaves.

Below is a list, up to date as of April this year, of towns and cities in which Muslim men have been convicted of grooming offences against non-Muslim children. Rotherham is merely the most high profile case to date, and given the police and authorities' well-documented aversion to investigating or prosecuting the crimes of Muslims, I'd confidently bet my life and yours on this list being, at absolute most, the tip of the iceberg. Where there are Pakistani/Kashmiri Muslims in Britain, there is sexual abuse and torture of non-Muslim children:

So tell us, Shami: is it still a "racist trope" if it demonstrably true?


Shami went on:


"It's been used throughout history and I never thought that this particular Brexit debate would reach this particular depth." 


And that, folks, is where we are. Apparently, anything even vaguely resembling honesty about the fact that more Muslims equals more sex crime is a new "depth" of depravity. Remember, vastly disproportionate levels of grooming, rape, sexual assault, and torture of non-Muslim girls and women by Muslim men is not the problem. The problem is talking about the fact that it happens.


That's how far we are from properly addressing the Islam problem in our countries.

Monday, 25 April 2016

BELATED: Saint George was not a Turk, a Syrian, or a "migrant", and here's why it matters

Another Saint George's Day, and another deluge of tweets from ignorant, virtue-signalling multiculti revisionist piss stains - witting and unwitting alike - about how England's patron saint was "Turkish" or "Syrian" (or both), and a "migrant". After all, it's so deliciously ironic when the only people who want to celebrate Saint George's Day are obviously just vulgar racists who hate Turks, Syrians, migrants, refugees, or anyone else from beyond the white cliffs of Dover.

You know the kind of people I'm talking about. They're the kind of people who believe that the Paris attacks last November do not demonstrate a need for tighter controls on the influx of Muslims into Europe, because the attackers were mostly French or Belgian "born and bred", just as French or Belgian as GĂ©rard Depardieu or Jean-Claude Van Dammeand therefore indicate that the problem of jihad is "home grown". They're the kind of people who believe that the Islamic State cannot possibly be Muslims or represent Islam, because Nadiya Hussain who won the Bake Off is a Muslim, and she's lovely. They're the kind of people who gather in a big, imaginary circle on social media in the wake of the latest Islamic atrocity on Western soil and metaphorically pull each other off while tweeting things like #terrorismhasnoreligion and "do we blame ALL Christians for the Westboro Baptist Church?!" (i.e. 38 fucking fruits with placards; nary an assault rifle, a suicide vest or a hijacked 767 in sight). And they're the kind of people who spontaneously ejaculate at the apparently Kathy Burke-esque Britishness of a Bangladeshi woman from Manchester who undertook hijra to the Caliphate with her five children to be with her husband, a former Guantanamo Bay detainee, only to return after deciding that it wasn't "wasn't (her) cup of tea", as though she represents some sort of triumph of multiculturalism and Muslim integration.

Well. Time, belatedly, for me to set a few things straight. Get yourselves comfy, because here is the truth about Saint George according to the most reliable accounts and scholarship pertaining to his own life, and the truth about the wider context, according to fucking reality.


Saint George was not Turkish. 



Modern Turkey is less than a century old, and is a successor to the Ottoman Empire which was established in the wake of the invasion and colonisation of Anatolia by Turkic peoples and Mongols. Once upon a time, what we today think of as Turkey (Anatolia) was inhabited largely by ethnic Greeks, Armenians, and Kurds. It still is, but the vast majority of those from the former two groups were assimilated under Ottoman rule. The Kurds largely retain a distinct identity ethnice and cultural identity, perhaps because many were already Muslims, and also because they mainly inhabit(ed) relatively remote mountainous areas.

Saint George was not "Syrian". 

There may well have been a region named Syria in the third and fourth centuries A.D., and Saint George may well have been born or lived there, but bar geography, it bears very little relation to the majority Muslim, culturally and linguistically Arab nation state of the same name which was carved out as a result of the Sykes-Picot agreement between the British and the French after World War I. There were no Muslims there then because there was no Islam, and there likely weren't too many Arabs around because they were mostly still confined to the Arabian deserts. There was also a region called Britain back then, but we haven't got a lot in common with the fucking Druids, have we?

Saint George was not a "migrant". 

However convenient it may be for virtue-signalling lemmings to pretend otherwise, Saint George was not a "migrant" in any sense of the term that anyone would understand in conventional usage, and certainly not in the sense that the mostly Muslim millions currently flooding into Europe are migrants. He was a soldier in the Roman army, and the son of an officer in that army. Moving from one part of said empire to another at any time in his life no more makes him a "migrant" than someone from the Royal Corps of Signals being sent to the Falkland Islands for six months makes them a "migrant".

Saint George was fucking Greek. 

He was Greek. His parents were Greeks. The clue lies in the fact that his name was fucking Georgios. Hint fucking hint. Ethnic Greeks existed in cultural, linguistic, and religious terms in the time of Saint George in a form which we today would recognise as pretty similar to contemporary Greeks. But nothing remotely resembling the modern nation states of Turkey or Syria, or indeed contemporary Turkish or Syrian ethno-religious identities, existed in any sense at that time.

Most importantly of all, Saint George was a Christian, and, if the hagiography is to be believed, was tortured and decapitated at the order of the Roman emperor Diocletian for steadfastly refusing to abandon Christianity.

Why does that matter?

Well, for my money, here's why: Christians are currently the victims of ethnic cleansing and genocide across Syria and Iraq today at the hands of Islamic supremacists. That's why it matters.

So the day of remembrance for a Christian martyr is a good time to ask why the historically Christian nation of the United Kingdom is not bending over backwards to offer refuge and a second chance at life to the oppressed and long-suffering Christians and other religious minorities of the Middle East.

And no. I'm not a believing Christian. In everything but name and baptism (Anglican), I'm irreligious. But I'd like to see our leaders direct our good will and our humanity toward people who don't turn up with the mentality of colonisers and theocratic supremacists for a fucking change, rather than fucking virtue-signalling our way right up to the gates of demography's big halal abattoir.

Share this post now, but more importantly, bookmark it, remember it, and share it in the run-up to Saint George's Day 2017 and beyond. Or, for that matter, any time you see someone repeating ideologically motivated misinformation about England's patron saint.

Done.